Highlights
Quality
The court has historically almost always sided with the powerful
Hartman’s central thesis is that the supreme court has always sided with the wealthy powerful and corporate against the poor we... Read More
Nothing is new and due to a lack of experience in real work and a lack of experience with the labor class these types of ideolo... Read More
Competitiveness
The 2010 citizens united ruling essentially handed our elections over to the highest bidder
Thanks for offering this book at a fair price
Helpful InsightsBETA
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Very educational we the people have to stay alert
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
While it gets a touch repetitious in places you’re still stunned at what they avoided telling you in school
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The pertinent cases cited in the authors arguments are appropriate and fairlyassessed when i look the cases up out of curiosity for more info i find that they are presented accurately in the book not spindoctored to support a point
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Be wary very intelligent people the most intelligent usually that never have to actually participate in the production of anything of value labor invention entrepreneurship tend to mentally live in a world of theoretical where an idea enters their head they imagine the outcome they become obsessed with seeing the outcome manifest but never allow themselves to look at history for failed attempts at their bold new ideas
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Nothing is new and due to a lack of experience in real work and a lack of experience with the labor class these types of ideologues are never hit in the face with the reality of how murderously poorly their ideas would manifest
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Reinvent history to persuade people against their own interests
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Instead of interpretation within the context of changing societal direction and needs many of the conservative judges peruse 18th century dictionaries and try to shoehorn societal needs into antiquated paradigms
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The supreme court has moved from a court interpreting the constitution for the people to one which justifies its interpretation according to the needs of the elitist plutocracy of deep pockets and corporate needs