Ask Fakespot Chat questions about this productAlpha
Add detailed feedback
Message
Loading suggested questions
Suggested Questions
Suggested Questions
No suggested questions were found
Highlights
Quality
I am particularly grateful for the bibliography
Even though the author suggests skipping the mathematics and reading on if the reader is unfamiliar with the subject i feel suc... Read More
We are in 1989 penrose starts with the hypothesis that consciousness is nonalgorithmic therefore cannot emerge in computers
Price
As described good price fast delivery great seller
Of course this approach has its price namely the mathematical complexity
418this is an exciting thoughtprovoking if controversial
Overview
- How are reviewers describing this item?
human, mathematical, conscious, good and strong. - Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is minimal deception involved.
- Our engine has determined that the review content quality is high and informative.
- Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 77.8% of the reviews are reliable.
- This product had a total of 101 reviews as of our last analysis date on Oct 26 2020.
Helpful InsightsBETA
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
This book demonstrates rigorously that the brain even of a dog does not work like a turing machine
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The argument is based on the incompleteness theorem of gödel
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The proof of that theorem is trivial ans is based on the good old trick that states « in a village a barber shaves all people that do not shave themselves and only these people » diagonal argument
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The reasoning is the same an autopilot will not make a bad pilot a good pilot because there always will be some circumstances where the computer will not have been trained to handle a given configuration
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
For example if the aircraft stalls after gaining a lot of altitude and the sensors send wrong information about the airspeed the incompetent pilot will pull the stick because the computer says falsely that the airspeed is claimed to be correct
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
It is taught not to pull the stick in a stalled configuration in the very first flying lesson
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The computer does not correlate the gain in altitude and the loss of speed because it is just a stupid automaton
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Then the pilot will crash stupidly the aircraft into the sea
Review Count History
Ask Fakespot Chat questions about this productAlpha
Add detailed feedback
Message
Loading suggested questions
Suggested Questions
Suggested Questions
No suggested questions were found