What does this mean?Pros & Cons
Cons
Other supporting characters such as the exotics could have been better explored. The asimov foundation series is a much better sf collection.
Highlights
Quality
I am rereading the childe cycle books
There is something vaguely platonic think the tripartite soul at work in the story that adds some depth although i recommend it... Read More
Familiarity with the rest of the childe cycle is not necessary at all and honestly this book is much better than tactics of mis... Read More
Overview
- How are reviewers describing this item?
novel, main, great, first and better. - Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is minimal deception involved.
- Our engine has determined that the review content quality is high and informative.
- Our engine has discovered that over 90% high quality reviews are present.
- This product had a total of 106 reviews as of our last analysis date on Jul 7 2022.
Helpful InsightsBETA
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Its not a classic for nothing
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Was by far my favorite book in the series this book also was very good told in the point of view of someone with less than pure motives
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Twelve more words requirednow eight and sixall these needless requirements
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Not bad for when they were written but definitely not up to what people are used to from current writers
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Then again i just read a pahlniuk novel that was pretty badly written so maybe not
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
It stands fairly well on its own but probably should be read after the preceding novels of the childe cycle
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Certain literary conventions were in vogue then that arent now fans of 60s70s era scifi style will like the tone and style dickson achieves here
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
This is because the dorsai are terrible stock for characters
Review Count History
