Fakespot Header Logo

Fakespot Review Analyzer Report

Schick Hydro 5 Sensitive Razor

Schick Hydro 5 Sensitive Razor

Sold by Schick
Company Product Reviews Grade:B

In category Health & Personal Care


Fakespot Review Grade

C
Our analysis detected 25.5% low quality reviews


Analyzed on:Jul 17, 2017
This analysis is quite old, would you like to reanalyze?
Yellow point

There are indications of unreliable/low quality reviews. You be the judge.

3.15591591

Analysis overview

Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 74.5% of the reviews are reliable.
This product had a total of 591 reviews on Jul 17 2017.
Interesting tidbit: the most used word by reviewers is razor.
How are reviewers describing this item?
great, tried, best, last and good.
Our engine has detected that Amazon has altered and removed reviews from this listing. We approximate total reviews removed to be 171.
Previous analysis of this listing was an C grade.
Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there may be deception involved.
Our engine has determined that the review content quality is low.

Reviews summary

Now for the schick hydro 5: i have only used the hydro 5 razor once, but i just got the be

I have had a difficult beard since my teens, with thick hair that grow in from multiple directions, as well as sensitive skin

You get the idea

Electrics work ok, but i have to use them twice a day to keep up



Review Count

Loading...


Price Track

Loading...




Unreliable Reviewer
Joseph
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Repeats reviews text
✓ Reviews content are of a poor quality
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.

Unreliable Reviewer
Michael G.
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Repeats reviews text
✓ Reviews content are of a poor quality
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.

Unreliable Reviewer
Francisco Barberan
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Repeats reviews text
✓ Reviews content are of a poor quality
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.


[["razor", 57], ["shave", 34], ["blades", 32], ["gillette", 25], ["schick", 23], ["blade", 21], ["hydro", 20], ["great", 16], ["shaving", 16], ["tried", 14], ["harry's", 13], ["like", 13], ["about", 13], ["skin", 13], ["best", 12], ["product", 11], ["last", 11], ["time", 10], ["good", 10], ["using", 10], ["fusion", 10], ["quality", 9], ["well", 9], ["razors", 9], ["back", 8], ["smooth", 8], ["brand", 8], ["years", 8], ["mach", 8], ["next", 7], ["experience", 7], ["close", 7], ["from", 7], ["week", 7], ["burn", 6], ["less", 6], ["brands", 6], ["proglide", 6], ["how", 6], ["shaves", 6], ["new", 6], ["actually", 6], ["made", 6], ["sensitive", 6], ["long", 6], ["love", 6], ["better", 5], ["opinion", 5], ["money", 5], ["trimmer", 5], ["other", 5], ["same", 5], ["thought", 5], ["days", 5], ["products", 5], ["noticed", 5], ["buy", 5], ["expensive", 5], ["reviews", 5], ["highly", 5], ["excellent", 5], ["works", 5], ["seems", 5], ["flip", 5], ["gel", 5]]

Fakespot Review Grade

C
Our analysis detected 25.5% low quality reviews




Ring alt

Copyright 2018 Fakespot

Back to Top