Fakespot Header Logo

Fakespot Review Analyzer Report

Q-tips Cotton Swabs 500 Count

Q-tips Cotton Swabs 500 Count

Sold by Q-Tips
Company Product Reviews Grade:B


Fakespot Review Grade

C
Our analysis detected 27.6% low quality reviews


Analyzed on:Mar 19, 2018
This analysis is quite old, would you like to reanalyze?
Yellow point

There are indications of unreliable/low quality reviews. You be the judge.

3.35.00.0

Analysis overview

Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 72.4% of the reviews are reliable.
This product had a total of 1830 reviews on Mar 19 2018.
Our engine detects that in general the reviewers have a neutral sentiment.
Interesting tidbit: the most used word by reviewers is good.
How are reviewers describing this item?
good, great, best, clean and cheap.
Our engine has detected that Amazon has deleted and scrubbed reviews from this listing. We approximate total reviews deleted to be 1137.
Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there may be deception involved.
Our engine has determined that the review content quality is low.

Reviews summary

Who doesn't love qtips and of course i put them in my ears ear sticks rock i mean it's a q-tip, so if it fails at that then everything as the human race knows it, is at an end

Very strong clean sweep the best on the market cleans your ears good you know what it does hahait does its job so i'm satisfied they are q tips, what can you say



Review Count

Loading...


Price Track

Loading...




Unreliable Reviewer
scott olson
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Has done a total of 6 reviews for the same company
✓ Extremely positive reviews for a singular company
✓ Repeats reviews text
✓ Reviews content are of a poor quality
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.

Unreliable Reviewer
Winho
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Language utilizes many superlatives or is suspiciously positive
✓ Repeats reviews text
✓ Reviews content are of a poor quality
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.

Unreliable Reviewer
Neena
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.


[["good", 29], ["great", 22], ["product", 15], ["q-tips", 13], ["price", 12], ["best", 11], ["brand", 11], ["ears", 10], ["clean", 8], ["ear", 8], ["value", 6], ["cheap", 6], ["love", 6], ["cleaning", 6], ["buy", 5], ["enough", 4], ["other", 4], ["cotton", 4], ["far", 4], ["say", 4], ["quality", 4], ["better", 4], ["well", 3], ["expected", 3], ["about", 3], ["brands", 3], ["tips", 3], ["q", 3], ["job", 3], ["strong", 3], ["q-tip", 3], ["excellent", 3], ["sure", 3], ["things", 2], ["they're", 2], ["reason", 2], ["long", 2], ["right", 2], ["company", 2], ["work", 2], ["priced", 2], ["money", 2], ["uses", 2], ["many", 2], ["described", 2], ["flimsy", 2], ["awesome", 2], ["works", 2], ["ones", 2], ["knock", 2], ["every", 2], ["tip", 2], ["generic", 2], ["mean", 2], ["sticks", 2], ["put", 2], ["fast", 2], ["qtip", 2], ["how", 2], ["know", 2], ["pretty", 2], ["applying", 2], ["back", 2], ["qtips", 2], ["years", 1]]

Fakespot Review Grade

C
Our analysis detected 27.6% low quality reviews




Ring alt

Copyright 2018 Fakespot

Back to Top