Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

In fact they can be easily resisted which is why an atheist may deny the existence of god while affirming moral obligations and human worth

Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

Theistic arguments then are attempts to give rational form to the experience of the natural signs but there is no philosophical argument that simply expresses the experience of the sign

Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

This book is a blockbuster and explains why theistic reasoning remains alive and well despite the modern bias against it from atheists and from theists who just don’t like the traditional formulations of the arguments

Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

The awareness of pervasive contingency directs our mind toward a deeper more permanent mode of existence

Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

I echo the sentiments by other reviewers regarding the pros

Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

In the case of the cosmological arguments they presuppose an intelligibility underlying the universe that could only make sense if the universe werent a brute fact to begin with

Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

I found this premise to be unsupported