Pros & Cons
Cons
There is no excuse for his getting this wrong. The history of american involvement in afghanistan is covered in less than 20 pages in the first chapter.
He misleads about the idea of anyone imagining before 9-11-01 that hijacked airliners might be used as missiles, reminiscent of the same lies by condi rice. He also fully supports rumsfeld's lies and he claims that the bush administration had to lie a... Read More
A skilled writer, friedman has the earmarkings of a propagandist. Friedman does his readers no favours by leaving them with an unjustified sense of confidence that current american policy will prevail. Friedman is also dishonest when he writes about a... Read More
I understand that * bin laden believes the same of his dream of caliphate. The fact that no arab regimes have yet succumbed to a mass-islamist movement from below, is no indication that that will not happen in the future. The * in spain was almost cer... Read More
Friedman also poo-poohs the 2002 saudi peace offer, characterizing it as nothing but political posturing. Friedman gives a really bizarre justification for the us policy of arming both iran and iraq during the * war which raged between these two natio... Read More
Highlights
Quality
With the exception of condoleezza rice women in leadership are nowhere to be seen
Helpful InsightsBETA
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
I can not confirm or deny anything in the book
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
However if i could i might say that he wrote about an mi unit that was on the front line for intelligence gathering
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Or file your own foia requests
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
I would start with an iraqi who defected to the eu with full battle plans of the first gulf war
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Sorry if this book bursts your small minded bubble you live in
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
We will never know the whole truth
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
That being said this book is very unbiased and nothing but the facts of history