Fakespot Header Logo

Fakespot Review Analyzer Report


This analysis is quite old, would you like to reanalyze?
Yellow point

There are indications of unreliable/low quality reviews. You be the judge.

2.65.00.0

Analysis overview

Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 73.9% of the reviews are reliable.
Our engine detects that in general the reviewers have a neutral sentiment.
Interesting tidbit: the most used word by reviewers is flash.
How are reviewers describing this item?
flash, great, good, better and quality.
Our engine has detected that Amazon has deleted and scrubbed reviews from this listing. We approximate total reviews deleted to be 1.
Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there may be deception involved.
Our engine has determined that the review content quality is low.

Reviews summary

The batteries seem to last, and i love the versatility of this external flash

Works great so far works fantastic this works great

Unless i start getting paid very well for my photography, i don't see a need to use any other brand of flash

Flash also works great while on the camera, don't look any further



Review Count

Loading...


Price Track

Loading...




Unreliable Reviewer
Richard C.
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Reviewer account looks to be generated by automation
✓ Language utilizes many superlatives or is suspiciously positive
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.

Unreliable Reviewer
alberto figueroa
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Repeats reviews text
✓ Reviews content are of a poor quality
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.

Unreliable Reviewer
Lucas Gonzalez
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Has done a total of 7 reviews for the same company
✓ Extremely positive reviews for a singular company
✓ Repeats reviews text
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.


[["flash", 106], ["canon", 50], ["great", 48], ["works", 38], ["price", 29], ["well", 23], ["flashes", 20], ["good", 20], ["love", 18], ["using", 17], ["yn", 17], ["other", 17], ["better", 17], ["unit", 16], ["yongnuo", 15], ["quality", 15], ["camera", 15], ["ex", 14], ["power", 12], ["features", 12], ["d", 12], ["still", 11], ["excellent", 11], ["far", 11], ["like", 10], ["manual", 10], ["slave", 10], ["from", 9], ["time", 9], ["master", 9], ["battery", 9], ["everything", 9], ["ttl", 9], ["need", 9], ["purchase", 8], ["high", 8], ["work", 8], ["yn-", 8], ["about", 8], ["easy", 7], ["light", 7], ["set", 7], ["exii", 7], ["speedlite", 7], ["times", 7], ["know", 6], ["bought", 6], ["nikon", 6], ["ettl", 6], ["product", 6], ["thing", 6], ["mode", 6], ["speed", 6], ["remote", 6], ["nice", 6], ["ii", 6], ["wireless", 6], ["door", 6], ["problems", 6], ["photos", 6], ["shots", 6], ["new", 6], ["hss", 6], ["first", 6], ["buy", 6]]

Fakespot Review Grade

C
Our analysis detected 26.1% low quality reviews




Ring alt

Copyright 2018 Fakespot

Back to Top