This analysis is outdated. Please reanalyze.

VerifiedTrusted Partner

Fakespot Verified Deals

Question
Check out Amazon Deals provided by our trusted partner Brad's Deals!
Get Better Amazon Deals  White arrow
Overview
  • How are reviewers describing this item?
    better, many, economic and psychological.
  • Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is minimal deception involved.
  • Our engine has determined that the review content quality is high and informative.
  • Our engine has discovered that over 80% high quality reviews are present.
  • This product had a total of 124 reviews as of our last analysis date on May 30 2020.
Details

BETA

This feature is in BETA, meaning the algorithms used to provide these results are constantly improving. These results might change.

Most positive reviewquestion

I loved this book because it showed me how much I don't know and need to learn.

Least positive reviewquestion

Not enough review data to provide meaningful insight.

Most authentic reviewquestion

Not enough review data to provide meaningful insight.

Least authentic reviewquestion

Not enough review data to provide meaningful insight.


Helpful Insights

BETA

This feature is in BETA, meaning the algorithms used to provide these results are constantly improving. These results might change.

    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    Smart, thoughtful and thought-provoking, this book is not the detached clinical view of an academic researcher, but grounded by payne’s own experience of growing up poor in kentucky.


    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    Unlike many books that start off strong and then taper of after the first few chapters, the broken ladder was a gripping read from start to finish.


    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    For me, it read more like a research paper than a book.


    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    God, conspiracies, and the language of the angels: why people believe what they need to believe.


    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    Humans have the ability to detect systematic deception and if that systematic deception involves more than one person, it would in fact be a conspiracy.


    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    It is not unreasonable to dispute the details of a conspiracy.


    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    But the implication that conspiracy equals delusion is false.

Review Count History
Loading...
Price History
Loading...