NEW! Fakespot Chat is live. 

Get answers to your product questions here.

This analysis is outdated. Please reanalyze.

Highlights

The AI used to provide these results are constantly improving. These results might change.

Quality


The quality of the lens is ok and could fit better but the optics are sharp


The build quality is significantly better than what is typically kitted with dslrs these days


Dont expect the same quality as a fast prime lens but for the price it shouldnt be a disappointment


Overall the image quality is good for an ultrawide zoom lens

Shipping


The price for this lens was very good and the shipping fast

Competitiveness


Replaced my very old nikon 18200 lens on a nikon d7000


I paired this lens with a nikon d5300


Great zoom range although i dont think its an actual 250mm

Overview

  • How are reviewers describing this item?
    great.
  • Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is minimal deception involved.
  • Our engine has detected that Amazon has altered, modified or removed reviews from this listing. We approximate total reviews altered up to 11.
  • Our engine has discovered that over 80% high quality reviews are present.
  • This product had a total of 973 reviews as of our last analysis date on Jul 31 2021.

Helpful InsightsBETA

The AI used to provide these results are constantly improving. These results might change.

    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    Lighter than my other zooms 18135 no lens creep


    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    Noticeable loss of image sharpness at longer focal lengths


    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    Dont expect the same quality as a fast prime lens but for the price it shouldnt be a disappointment


    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    The picture quality is essentially the same as my kit 1855mm a little bit worse indoor low light no difference outside


    Posted by a reviewer on Amazon

    As you would expect when compared to my legacy fixedlength manual lenses the colours on the sigma were not as richly saturated and the resolution poorer

Review Count History
Loading...
Price History
Loading...