Fakespot Header Logo

Fakespot Review Analyzer Report

Logitech MX Revolution Cordless Laser Mouse (Black)

Logitech MX Revolution Cordless Laser Mouse (Black)

Sold by Logitech
Company Product Reviews Grade:B

In category Mice


Fakespot Review Grade

C
Our analysis detected 28.0% low quality reviews


Analyzed on:Nov 2, 2016
This analysis is quite old, would you like to reanalyze?
Yellow point

There are indications of unreliable/low quality reviews. You be the judge.

3.05.00.0

Analysis overview

Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 72.0% of the reviews are reliable.
This product had a total of 720 reviews on Nov 2 2016.
Interesting tidbit: the most used word by reviewers is mouse.
How are reviewers describing this item?
great, best and good.
Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there may be deception involved.
Our engine has determined that the review content quality is low.

Reviews summary

This mouse is excellent, and there is heavy debate about whether it's better than its successor, the logitech wireless performance mouse mx for pc and mac

The mx performance mouse is quite a bit cheaper, but if you really want the mx revolution mouse and don't want to spend $200+ on a mouse then i recommend looking at the logitech cordless desktop mx 5500 revolution bluetooth mouse and keyboard

As far as i can tell the only difference between the two mx revolution mice is that the mouse that comes in the mx5500 mouse+keyboard set uses the bluetooth radio frequency standard and the mx revolution mouse that is being sold separately here uses radio frequency for wireless communication but doesn't use the bluetooth standard

As a result of using bluetooth the mx revolution mouse in the mx5500 mouse+keyboard set has the standard 1/2 to 1 second bluetooth lag when initially connecting up to the wireless transceiver (usb dongle that plugs into usb port on computer)



Review Count

Loading...


Price Track

Loading...




Unreliable Reviewer
Don Shields
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.

Unreliable Reviewer
stephen
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.

Unreliable Reviewer
E. Nicewonder
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.


[["mouse", 401], ["mx", 113], ["wheel", 88], ["logitech", 84], ["revolution", 77], ["battery", 63], ["scroll", 61], ["like", 55], ["great", 54], ["about", 51], ["using", 51], ["mice", 51], ["best", 48], ["buttons", 43], ["button", 42], ["scrolling", 40], ["years", 39], ["from", 38], ["time", 37], ["hand", 37], ["back", 35], ["love", 32], ["well", 31], ["other", 30], ["good", 30], ["since", 29], ["long", 29], ["performance", 29], ["wireless", 29], ["works", 28], ["still", 28], ["buy", 27], ["software", 27], ["bluetooth", 27], ["life", 27], ["ever", 26], ["find", 26], ["side", 26], ["thumb", 26], ["computer", 26], ["comfortable", 25], ["charging", 25], ["hands", 24], ["over", 24], ["new", 24], ["far", 24], ["right", 23], ["windows", 23], ["into", 23], ["cordless", 23], ["think", 22], ["days", 22], ["price", 22], ["charge", 22], ["click", 21], ["set", 21], ["two", 21], ["bought", 20], ["features", 20], ["nice", 20], ["web", 20], ["thing", 19], ["how", 19], ["doesn't", 19], ["easy", 19]]

Fakespot Review Grade

C
Our analysis detected 28.0% low quality reviews




Ring alt

Copyright 2018 Fakespot

Back to Top