Fakespot Header Logo

Fakespot Review Analyzer Report

Gravitation Physics Series

Gravitation Physics Series

In category Books


Fakespot Review Grade

C
Our analysis detected 33.3% low quality reviews


Analyzed on:Jan 24, 2017
This analysis is quite old, would you like to reanalyze?
Yellow point

There are indications of unreliable/low quality reviews. You be the judge.

2.65.00.0

Analysis overview

Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 66.7% of the reviews are reliable.
This product had a total of 55 reviews on Jan 24 2017.
Interesting tidbit: the most used word by reviewers is book.
How are reviewers describing this item?
general, first, good, subject and best.
Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there may be deception involved.
Our engine has determined that the review content quality is low.

Reviews summary

It is a little bit too wordy though, which results in the unusually huge volume, i usually consult wald when looking for some particular subject, and if treatments there are too terse to be understood, this book is a good better for help

The authors are leading experts on gravitational theory and this book is a comphrensive treatment of the field up to the developments to 1970, they write in a vivid, humourous manner, and spiced with stories, illustrations and wisdoms



Review Count

Loading...




Unreliable Reviewer
smallphi
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.

Unreliable Reviewer
Professor Joseph L. McCauley
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.

Unreliable Reviewer
Dr. Lee D. Carlson
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.


[["book", 349], ["relativity", 194], ["general", 151], ["physics", 107], ["read", 64], ["from", 63], ["theory", 62], ["books", 61], ["understand", 51], ["first", 50], ["geometry", 49], ["good", 44], ["subject", 43], ["best", 42], ["other", 41], ["time", 40], ["most", 40], ["chapters", 40], ["gravitational", 40], ["great", 39], ["gravity", 38], ["differential", 38], ["gr", 35], ["mathematics", 35], ["like", 34], ["two", 33], ["study", 33], ["discussion", 33], ["gravitation", 33], ["who", 33], ["tensor", 32], ["still", 32], ["such", 31], ["advanced", 31], ["presentation", 31], ["math", 30], ["text", 30], ["introduction", 30], ["about", 30], ["many", 29], ["notation", 29], ["into", 28], ["may", 28], ["quantum", 28], ["well", 28], ["mathematical", 28], ["field", 28], ["material", 27], ["little", 27], ["authors", 27], ["part", 26], ["before", 26], ["calculus", 26], ["approach", 26], ["physical", 26], ["ever", 26], ["special", 25], ["reference", 25], ["chapter", 24], ["better", 24], ["volume", 24], ["einstein", 23], ["pages", 23], ["found", 23], ["give", 23]]

Fakespot Review Grade

C
Our analysis detected 33.3% low quality reviews




Ring alt

Copyright 2018 Fakespot

Back to Top