Fakespot Header Logo

Fakespot Review Analyzer Report


Analyzed on:Jan 8, 2018
This analysis is quite old, would you like to reanalyze?
Yellow point

There are indications of unreliable/low quality reviews. You be the judge.

2.45.00.0

Analysis overview

Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 74.0% of the reviews are reliable.
This product had a total of 837 reviews on Jan 8 2018.
Our engine detects that in general the reviewers have a neutral sentiment.
Interesting tidbit: the most used word by reviewers is lens.
How are reviewers describing this item?
great, macro, quality, fisheye and wide.
Our engine has detected that Amazon has deleted and scrubbed reviews from this listing. We approximate total reviews deleted to be 7.
Previous analysis of this listing was an C grade.
Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there may be deception involved.
Our engine has determined that the review content quality is low.

Reviews summary

The fish eye lens is great because you don't see black on the corners

I'm just a regular person with no photography studies and i give my cellphone camera a regular use, i bought this because sometimes i wish my cellphone capture wider photographs, this lens improved that and i'm really happy with it, the quality is great and with the macro lens is amazing, i've attached a picture taken with the macro lens, again i'm no professional or even amateur



Review Count

Loading...


Price Track

Loading...




Unreliable Reviewer
Paulo Nascimento
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Language utilizes many superlatives or is suspiciously positive
✓ Has done a total of 10 reviews for the same company
✓ Extremely positive reviews for a singular company
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.

Unreliable Reviewer
Amazon Customer
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.

Unreliable Reviewer
giblater
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Repeats reviews text
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.


[["lens", 45], ["lenses", 31], ["great", 28], ["macro", 17], ["quality", 16], ["product", 15], ["fisheye", 14], ["wide", 14], ["phone", 13], ["angle", 13], ["camera", 13], ["iphone", 12], ["aukey", 11], ["easy", 11], ["lense", 10], ["from", 10], ["well", 10], ["works", 10], ["price", 10], ["pictures", 8], ["nice", 8], ["photos", 7], ["little", 7], ["case", 7], ["good", 7], ["love", 6], ["optic", 6], ["awesome", 6], ["work", 6], ["didn't", 6], ["first", 6], ["recommend", 6], ["bought", 6], ["photography", 6], ["samsung", 6], ["carrying", 5], ["extra", 5], ["super", 5], ["customer", 5], ["blurry", 5], ["around", 5], ["thing", 5], ["taken", 5], ["gift", 5], ["put", 5], ["sure", 5], ["using", 4], ["impressed", 4], ["kit", 4], ["cell", 4], ["x", 4], ["review", 4], ["how", 4], ["shot", 4], ["two", 4], ["like", 4], ["highly", 4], ["getting", 4], ["attach", 4], ["new", 4], ["clip", 4], ["second", 4], ["picture", 4], ["regular", 4], ["need", 4]]

Fakespot Review Grade

C
Our analysis detected 26.0% low quality reviews




Ring alt

Copyright 2018 Fakespot

Back to Top