What does this mean?Pros & Cons
Pros
In spite of his shortsightedness, it is still well worth reading. The book reads quickly and entertainingly.
Avlon calls on daniel dennett to bolster the idea of free will. He says it's important to sharpen our tools so that we can do better.
Optical illusions are good illusions for ray's purposes; they advance his argument. Their enterprise is not unlike ray's in his attempt to communicate his intuitive feelings about a piece of chamber music. While ray is adamantly opposed to having the ... Read More
Cons
After 48 pages of gobbledegook we arrive at the amazing idea that not all meaning is in the words. By the end of the book we discover that rational and inferential thinking are not the same. For a better understanding try prof.
Highlights
Quality
He doesnt want us to change our understanding lets stick with the status quoin the ordinary perspective yes virginia we have free will
You are just a chance product of mindless evolutionary processes operating in a insignificant corner of the universe
149to further bolster the idea that free will shouldnt be messed with he calls on daniel dennett proposing that evolution equip... Read More
And the conscious sense that one sentence logically follows from anotherthat your reasoning is rationalis itself an intuitive judgment
Overview
- How are reviewers describing this item?
free, ordinary and rational. - Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there is minimal deception involved.
- Our engine has determined that the review content quality is high and informative.
- Our engine has discovered that over 90% high quality reviews are present.
- This product had a total of 18 reviews as of our last analysis date on Oct 27 2022.
Helpful InsightsBETA
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The issues are so central to human nature and thought however that there cant help but be controversy about the best approach to resolving them
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Probably everyone has their own opinion
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
I think he shortchanges objective values discourse level analysis and the extent to which language and syntax make the mind human
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Jackendoff assumes that language is not written on a blank slate but is learned by brains prepared for it
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
We assume that the connection between the world and the words we use is pretty tightafter all language allows us to build houses bridges and corporations
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
Closer inspection shows that theres a lot going on under the hood that escapes the casual observer and the connection is looser than we might have thought
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
The problem is that he falls prey to some of the very traps he exposes
Posted by a reviewer on Amazon
At first blush these perspectives seem like useful approaches to the study of language thought and meaning and no doubt they are but theres a danger in any approach that divides the world into neat categories and ray is well aware of it
Review Count History
Price History
