Fakespot Header Logo

Fakespot Review Analyzer Report


Analyzed on:Apr 24, 2017
This analysis is quite old, would you like to reanalyze?
Yellow point

There are indications of unreliable/low quality reviews. You be the judge.

1.35.00.0

Analysis overview

Our engine has analyzed and discovered that 44.7% of the reviews are reliable.
This product had a total of 324 reviews on Apr 24 2017.
Interesting tidbit: the most used word by reviewers is oil.
How are reviewers describing this item?
essential, great, many, good and few.
Our engine has detected that Amazon has deleted and scrubbed reviews from this listing. We approximate total reviews deleted to be 567.
Previous analysis of this listing was an F grade.
Our engine detects that in general the reviewers have a suspiciously positive sentiment.
Our engine has profiled the reviewer patterns and has determined that there may be deception involved.
Our engine has determined that the review content quality is low.

Reviews summary

Thank you for reading my review and hope my honest review on the product was helpful for you

I received this product at a discount in exchange for an unbiased, honest review and my review is based solely on this product

The opinions stated in this review are 100% honest and i am not being paid to review this product nor will i take payment to review a product!



Review Count

Loading...


Price Track

Loading...




Unreliable Reviewer
Diana M Hurley
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Has done a total of 5 reviews for the same company
✓ Extremely positive reviews for a singular company
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.

Unreliable Reviewer
Paul Ireland
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Language utilizes many superlatives or is suspiciously positive
✓ Repeats reviews text
✓ Reviews content are of a poor quality
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.

Unreliable Reviewer
matt fore
Reviewer Analysis:
✓ Overwhelming amount of positive reviews
✓ Language utilizes many superlatives or is suspiciously positive
✓ Repeats reviews text
✓ Reviews content are of a poor quality
✓ Correlation with other fake reviewers' profile data and language.
✓ Large number of reviews created on the same date.


[["oil", 117], ["tree", 97], ["tea", 93], ["product", 38], ["essential", 29], ["great", 24], ["fungus", 21], ["many", 21], ["review", 19], ["bottle", 19], ["works", 17], ["using", 16], ["skin", 15], ["drops", 14], ["uses", 14], ["dropper", 14], ["good", 13], ["put", 12], ["well", 12], ["few", 12], ["like", 12], ["from", 12], ["time", 11], ["love", 10], ["homemade", 9], ["foot", 9], ["honest", 9], ["way", 9], ["help", 9], ["comes", 9], ["nails", 8], ["nail", 8], ["toenail", 8], ["months", 8], ["started", 8], ["shampoo", 8], ["other", 8], ["products", 8], ["avo", 8], ["day", 7], ["add", 7], ["infections", 7], ["daily", 7], ["kill", 7], ["over", 7], ["quality", 7], ["mix", 7], ["natural", 7], ["feet", 6], ["coconut", 6], ["glass", 6], ["about", 6], ["amazing", 6], ["smell", 6], ["helps", 6], ["almost", 6], ["clean", 6], ["found", 6], ["received", 6], ["acne", 6], ["face", 6], ["into", 6], ["pure", 6], ["his", 5], ["stuff", 5]]

Fakespot Review Grade

F
Our analysis detected 55.3% low quality reviews




Ring alt

Copyright 2018 Fakespot

Back to Top