Galaxy S22 Ultra Screen Protecto... vs Spigen NeoFlex Screen Protector ...

Don't hesitate. Glue is only around the edges, but it seems to be secure. Kudos to the seller abd amazon also.

After adjusting settings for sensitivity and restarting fingerprint option it goes like this. If you delete and redo your fingerprints (maybe 3 or 4 prints for each finger you wish to use) after installation, the sensor works every time.

I have a curved phone screen, and all is well. My case has a lens cover, and the lens protector doesn't inhibit it at all. It helps align the saver properly.

The fingerprint function says 100%, but it does not work at all. Always have to use pin number instead. The fingerprint area is a separate material and shows up 100% of the time.

One of my screen protectors was shipped to me cracked already. Messaged seller but never got a response. It is unusable, and since the whole kit was pulled apart, there is nothing to return.

The screen protector is not the best at all. One worse than the other, one breaking. Would not recommend.

Goes on easy enough with the wet application. I can easily reposition the neoflex screen protector during installation. Was a little hesitant to try this wet screen protector.

It's a nice protective cover that works well. Touch screen is responsive.

For the price this is awesome. No more cracked screen. Last, i have an extra screen protector in case this one gets worn down.

The image is very grainy and it doesn't go all the way to the edges. The material also obtains figerprints horribly, and the adhesive provides a grey sheen over the entire screen.